@timnitGebru@dair-community.social
2026-09-07 16:46 UTC
"Two of the most exciting results, the experts say, incorporate preexisting ideas from the recent mathematical literature without properly citing them. This contradicts OpenAI’s initial press release, which said that the problems Astra addressed “have been open and seen no progress on the main result for at least a decade.” (OpenAI has since updated the language to be more accurate).
Replies (2)
-
@timnitGebru@dair-community.social 2026-09-07 16:46
“They are running roughshod over the work of others who came before them in a deliberate way,” says Stephen Miller, a mathematician at Yeshiva University, who argues that OpenAI has effectively plagiarized his own research. “It seems completely systematic to me, and it points to research misconduct.”
-
@eckes@zusammenkunft.net 2026-09-08 00:32
@timnitGebru@dair-community.social define “properly”, is it mentioning the 10 zwar old paper or not?