Post #3986514

@emilymbender@dair-community.social So why & what are the ACM asking their “community of authors & contributors” about using their content to “imprint” LLMs? A. To be included as beneficiaries in any licensing deal? B. To ask consent per author or per paper for inclusion? C. Under no circumstances include an author’s work including posthumously? D. What? ACM have enough smart, intelligent members - why not setup their own LLM with their own content à la non-frontier “Kimi”? Learned-helplessness is not “appealing”.