Post #3980142
2026-07-21 03:57 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@hanscees@ieji.de 2026-07-21 08:20
@ryanboswell@sfba.social and how difficult would it be to plant ☘️ an malware thingy that attacks cars in this way? #infosec #iot
-
@kruemmelspalter@chaos.social 2026-07-21 11:53
@ryanboswell@sfba.social > "hidden attack surface" > not hidden
-
@jmcrookston@mastodon.social 2026-07-21 12:26
@ryanboswell@sfba.social So I opened the article expecting some kind of malware attack needed but nope the charger is just completely open to root access. Okay. "An EV charger's charging port is a network port. We found SSH and Telnet services exposed on XCharge C6 chargers with default root:root credentials. A threat actor with a malicious EV can gain immediate full control access on the charger and perform energy theft or potentially cause physical damage."
-
@fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.net 2026-07-21 15:35
@ryanboswell@sfba.social the UK's PSTI bans default credentials in consumer IOT devices, but exempts EV chargers that are covered by Electric Vehicles (Smart Charge Points) Regulations 2021: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2024/05/the-uk-bans-default-passwords.html The EV Smart Charger regulation does also require unique passwords per charger if present, however. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/1467/schedule/1/made Thus these chargers would be illegal in the UK.
-
@Jirikiha@raphus.social 2026-07-21 16:55
@ryanboswell@sfba.social "It’s like being able to stick in a specially formatted debit card and suddenly have full access to a bank’s entire internal system." Now, just to be clear, have we ruled out the possibility that debit cards could be programmed to gain access to the banks's or the ATM's system?