Post #3937306
2026-07-19 15:49 UTC
@joepie91@fedi.slightly.tech That was a general statement.
That being said to me last 3 paragraphs in your original post seemed to indirectly imply that (at least that's how it read to me). Perhaps in-part, because there was no acknowledgment of the utility potential anywhere...
Replies (1)
-
@joepie91@fedi.slightly.tech 2026-07-19 16:11
@ilia@phpc.social Why are you making a 'general statement' in my mentions instead of genuinely engaging with what I said? At least two of the three paragraphs were part of that general statement, and the remaining (first) paragraph barely contained any substance, it was more of a perfunctory nod. And why would I be obligated or expected to include an "acknowledgment of the utility potential" in my post? Or more precisely, why did you decide that because it *wasn't* there, it was appropriate to make the conversation about "utility" instead of its original topic? These are not rhetorical questions, to be clear, they are entirely serious.