Post #3938160

@ilia@phpc.social Why are you making a 'general statement' in my mentions instead of genuinely engaging with what I said? At least two of the three paragraphs were part of that general statement, and the remaining (first) paragraph barely contained any substance, it was more of a perfunctory nod. And why would I be obligated or expected to include an "acknowledgment of the utility potential" in my post? Or more precisely, why did you decide that because it *wasn't* there, it was appropriate to make the conversation about "utility" instead of its original topic? These are not rhetorical questions, to be clear, they are entirely serious.