Post #3858834
2026-07-16 12:40 UTC
@ajn142@infosec.exchange @Sempf@infosec.exchange @ifin@infosec.exchange
Perhaps. Either way, their writeup is quite lacking.
Leaving out details required to reproduce a thing you've bothered to write up seems less than ideal.
Replies (2)
-
@ajn142@infosec.exchange 2026-07-16 12:47
@wdormann@infosec.exchange @Sempf@infosec.exchange @ifin@infosec.exchange let he who hath not written anything up cast the first stone ;) My bet would be they didn’t dig in deep enough to the root cause. Pretty sure more time was taken in that article about how Cursor didn’t take them seriously than about the vulnerability itself
-
@Sempf@infosec.exchange 2026-07-16 15:06
@wdormann@infosec.exchange @ajn142@infosec.exchange @ifin@infosec.exchange I wasn't trying to meet some standard, I just thought it was a risk and wanted to let people know.