Post #3840058

2026-07-15 19:26 UTC

@mikalai@privacysafe.social @GeofCox@climatejustice.social I have genuinely no idea what any of that means but I note you did not attempt to address the shitting on our grandchildrens’ grandchildren point so not that interested tbh

Replies (2)

@mikalai@privacysafe.social 2026-07-15 19:33

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social Right. You don't have an idea about different fuel cycles, but you gonna be vocal. And of course, in a false dillema: nuclear with war heads and waste vs np nuclear, you will choose "no nuclear". But, because you were not presented nuances, you don't know about options, .... and snarkely drop ad-hominem (lovers of nuclear) in your social interactions. Don't repeat errors. Go into more details, historic details, especially around wealth taxes, as you will be talking about 'em.

Open ##3840057
@mikalai@privacysafe.social 2026-07-15 19:35

@JimmyB@mas.to @GeofCox@climatejustice.social Actually, "status quo nuclear", and "forget nuclear" both don't allow work on nuclear to cleanup existing mess. And you mention grandkids? I sense inconsistency here.

Open ##3840108