Post #37946
2025-12-07 10:55 UTC
But that doesn’t answer the question of whether we are morally obliged to use it for good purposes when possible. It’s just a different point entirely.
Replies (1)
-
@Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2025-12-07 13:21
Sounds to me like you’re fine with collateral damage as long as you get to edit certain neurodiverse people out of the gene pool.