Post #38174
2025-12-07 13:21 UTC
Sounds to me like you’re fine with collateral damage as long as you get to edit certain neurodiverse people out of the gene pool.
Replies (1)
-
@thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 2025-12-07 14:48
It’s actually absurd to me that you’re able to read that out of my comment. I’m literally asking whether we have a moral obligation to use the technology available to us to prevent cancer, ALS, Alzheimer’s, compromised immune systems, metabolic diseases, and fragile backs in our future children. I even specifically stated that this wasn’t about whether the same technology can be used for nefarious purposes, which is a different discussion entirely.