Post #3791427
2026-07-13 19:02 UTC
I mean yeah the scientific method and the tools of science, namely mathematics are indeed branches of philosophy, so is aesthetics but that doesn’t mean science is aesthetics. Now if the claim that Marxism-Leninism is “correct” aka the most optimal form of governance for producing human wellbeing then of course a system dedicated to finding through scientific enquiry the most optimal means of governance will scientifically proven said claim through all possible measurements. There’s no need to have feelings when we can have proof, quantifiable, measurable, repeatable proof.
Replies (1)
-
@Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2026-07-13 19:23
You’re still treating science like it’s not a process gone through by humans. Science once posited that race science was correct in order to justify eugenics. We need to be aware of our world outlook and correct it before we begin to use science, otherwise we come to incorrect conclusions and incorrect propositions. That’s my point. Marxism-Leninism is correct not because it is a “form of governance” (it isn’t) but because it’s a living social science grounded in scientific understanding of the world.