Post #3707761
2026-07-09 19:40 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@QCCEChris@mastodon.social 2026-07-09 20:04
@je5perl@eupolicy.social @mullvadnet@mastodon.online That also makes no sense, since its been rejected several times already. It should require 100% of the council to vote Yes to pass. That would make sense. (b) it shouldn't have even been raised again after its first rejection. I know this is an idealisation rather than reality. Perhaps this should also be the change required in the Eu commission rules and laws.
-
@wod0bow@mastodon.social 2026-07-09 22:54
@je5perl@eupolicy.social @mullvadnet@mastodon.online Yeah... Becouse this is "Normal" that you don't need even majority to pass the legislation. In Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was something like "liberum veto". It was a destructive construct, where one person could end any legislation screaming "Sisto activitatem!" or "Liberum veto!" or "I don't allow". There is no democration and even no consistency when sometimes the majority is needed to pass something and sometimes is enough to have minority to pass legislation.