Post #3674133
2026-07-08 13:54 UTC
I just caught that Libera.Chat uses the phrase "insufficient human involvement" and I love that specific phrasing for flagging LLM-generated pull requests.
https://libera.chat/#one-more-thing-about-llm-contributions
Replies (4)
-
@veronica@explains.social 2026-07-08 13:56
It's concise in a way that "no AI" isn't.
-
@ppulfer@mastodon.ie 2026-07-08 14:01
@veronica@explains.social, good explanation too: "(...) received a number of pull requests featuring obvious LLM-generated content. So far, these have all demonstrated non-understanding of either Libera Chat’s requirements or the codebases being contributed-to."
-
@d1@autistics.life 2026-07-08 16:04
@veronica@explains.social This extends beyond AI into what is commonly seen in dark psychology as well.
-
@BoydStephenSmithJr@hachyderm.io 2026-07-09 00:12
@veronica@explains.social According to the U.S. Copyright Office "insufficient human involvement" means the output doesn't get (new) copyright protections. (The output could still violate the copyrights of the authors of the training data for the model.)