Post #3663804
2026-07-08 04:10 UTC
It IS free software license. It just gives the freedom to turn it into proprietary too, in which case the new proprietary product is no longer licensed under MIT. Which in turn does not violate the MIT being free, as it became a different thing.
Replies (1)
-
@pineapple@lemmy.ml 2026-07-08 08:11
No. I’m talking about the free software foundations definition of free software. The mit license is an open source licence, not a free software license. Anyway, I’m interested as to why you don’t think the MIT license is worse than the GPL.