Elektrine lite

← Feed

@nycki@critters.gay

Post #3631630

2026-07-06 16:01 UTC

@mxchara@seattle.pink I'm using "lying" here to mean "saying something you know is false, on purpose". Normally when people say lying they mean "saying something false, on purpose, with the intent of being believed", so I'm clarifying here that sarcasm is like lying but without the intent of being believed. A lot of autistic people I've met are afraid of "saying falsehoods" in any context, because "that's lying", which is why I bothered to mention autistic people in this post clarifying the difference. I would argue that a reducto ad absurdum, as you've described it, is definitely sarcasm, and it's sarcasm for the same reason as I'm describing: taking an absurd conclusion as true would require a large update to my priors.

Replies (1)

  • @mxchara@seattle.pink 2026-07-06 16:03

    @nycki@critters.gay Why wouldn't I want to be believed if I employ sarcasm as a rhetorical device? I should hope that the point struck home. I most definitely would wish my words to be believed—I would wish for my logical inference to be believed.

    Open ##3631629