Post #3485800
2026-06-29 16:07 UTC
@la_rosa@todon.eu @joenepraat@todon.nl @gaufff@piaille.fr the necessity for neutrality is coming from the strong stance that we are not going to get involved in the larger debate around another VPN provider's actions. do we support or finance fascists or fascism with IVPN profits? no. that's a clear statement. are we going to evaluate, debate, and make a stance on a competitor's owner's actions? no. this is not our lane and we will stick to that. if this is not sufficient for you from a digital service, we accept it.
Replies (1)
-
@simonzerafa@infosec.exchange 2026-06-30 07:50
@ivpn@mastodon.social @la_rosa@todon.eu @joenepraat@todon.nl @gaufff@piaille.fr Great to hear it. Maybe add that to an FAQ so everyone is clear ๐๐