Elektrine lite

← Feed

@stickly@lemmy.world

Post #3336335

2026-06-10 00:10 UTC

Marx’s analysis doesn’t make the meme incorrect. He could be aware of the visible effect without fully understanding it’s mechanism and potential magnitude. Let’s not forget that Marx was working on Capital while the cutting edge of behavioral and cognitive science was phrenology ffs. His pool of knowledge and prognostic fidelity were fundamentally limited. Shopping and commodity addiction are no doubt exploited by capitalism but the neurobiological causes will exist independent of any economic system. You could live in a socialist utopia, and access to a diverse market of products or always-available acquisition (eg. an online marketplace) would still cause this problematic impulsive behavior. In the language of the meme, Marx considered “Shopping is fun” but not “Shopping is so fun! ❤️”

Replies (1)

  • @sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-06-10 00:42

    Ok, then I can say that Marx could say ‘shopping is so fun’ these days… because the magnitude and number of ways that alienation is occuring has dramatically increased. Yep, he had no understanding of neuroscience. But he had a theory of societies and people in them, with causal mechanisms and observable consequences, with considerable explanatory and predictive power… that didn’t need neuroscience.

    Open ##3336334