Post #3325853
2026-06-15 14:23 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2026-06-15 15:16
You just attack me personally the whole time with wrong accusations, instead bringing arguments for or against Wayland and X11. I very clearly attacked your argument (not you) as “Poisoning the Well”. Sounds like you’re not familiar with logical fallacies, I highly recommend reading up on them. you call me anti X11 Yes - that was me doing to you what you did to the author to show by example. You took that as an insult which is why I say calling the author of that article “anti-wayland” is well-poisoning. You’ve set the tone that the article is not to be taken seriously because of a perceived bias on the part of the author. You “besmirched” their reputation to, by association, attack the argument. This is practically the definition of Poisoning the Well. Just because I call the article Anti Wayland. That’s it, that is your basis. Yes - that was the fallacy. The “well-poisoning” if you will. If you simply said “Here is an article that points out some of the problems with Wayland” or something to that effect I wouldn’t have taken any issue.