Post #3323894
2026-06-15 05:28 UTC
You accuse me of poison? What nonsense is this? The author is anti Wayland and the entire post is about reasoning why you should not use Wayland. This is anti Wayland, not my opinion, no poisoning, nothing. I don’t agree with that person but still included it here, so we can see others perspectives too. I did not include any opinion or judge of me about that article, so nobody is poisoned by my opinion before reading it.
rather than pointing out that Wayland has very real problems even after >10 years of development.
Why don’t you do that? As you clearly know more than me.
Replies (1)
-
@atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2026-06-15 12:21
The author is anti Wayland The authors’ point of view does not matter. You’ve poisoned the well by presenting the data collected as potentially “tainted” by a bias that, even if true, does not change the data presented. So yes - clearly and very obviously poisoning the well. Textbook really. Why don’t you do that? The link you provided actually did that. But they are “anti-wayland”… Edit: and I’ll push back hard on the “anti-wayland” language as well. This is propaganda-style speech. People can “not like things” and disagree. But labeling somebody “anti-x” diminishes their opinions and ideas.