Post #3287666
2026-06-03 15:06 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@reykjalin@social.treehouse.systems 2026-06-03 15:11
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca I’m personally excited for a future where tiny but hyper specialized models you can run on your own computer are available. I don’t think I ever need these generally-“good”-at-everything style models. But something tiny that’s really good at React? Or testing strategies? Or finding articles written by people? I think I’d love that
-
@xpomul@norden.social 2026-06-03 15:14
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca I think there might be. The maths behind searching is creating a matrix of occurrences of words and compressing that matrix (Latent Semantic Indexing). In a very simplified way, LSI is like an LLM with a context of 0. So I guess LLMs which are also only matrices might be used in a similar way… (I am not very deep into the maths and theory of LLMs, but aren’t embeddings something in the direction you are looking for?)
-
@tom@labyrinth.social 2026-06-03 15:14
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca I can definitely imagine a few ways LLMs could make a search experience "better" but idk if the amount of "better" is worth the resources
-
@d6@merveilles.town 2026-06-03 15:19
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca one of the really sad things about this moment is that it seems like LLMs work best (fsvo "work" and "best") when interfacing between a person and a predictable/reliable/deterministic thing (such as a programming language type system for example) but instead people seem to be trying to replace all the predictable/reliable/deterministic things in our world with LLMs (which are not predictable, reliable, or deterministic). i feel this is especially true for search engines.