Post #3277943
2026-06-09 16:55 UTC
@lina@neuromatch.social ?
Replies (1)
-
@lina@neuromatch.social 2026-06-09 18:18
@Xavier@infosec.exchange we clearly have different commitments in this domain. I specifically asked for critical scholarship related to library work, not search terms or research initiatives that aim to affirm "ai" boosterism in any capacity. i firmly stand by the position that there is no responsible way to use generative "ai" in this context, for a variety of reasons, and my intended approach toward addressing its inevitable usage is one of harm reduction rather than giving credence, however conditional, to its usage. your reply wasn't asked for or welcome. hence, no.