Post #3214931
2025-07-01 00:16 UTC
Replies (8)
-
@tauon@possum.city 2025-07-01 01:08
@ehasbrouck@urbanists.social @Yuvalne@433.world good
-
@shadowfals@toot.cat 2025-07-01 01:32
@ehasbrouck@urbanists.social @Yuvalne@433.world How does that excuse Facebook?
-
@nargacutie@dragonchat.org 2025-07-01 02:47
@ehasbrouck@urbanists.social @Yuvalne@433.world good. access to knowledge should be free.
-
@dhobern@scicomm.xyz 2025-07-01 05:30
@ehasbrouck@urbanists.social @Yuvalne@433.world Aren't you (and NWU there) describing the IA National Emergency Library (which can certainly be debated) rather than how IA has operated outside a ~3-month period in 2020? Are you suggesting that IA is currently doing this?
-
@nerpa@nuclear.gelder.land 2025-07-01 08:39
@ehasbrouck@urbanists.social @Yuvalne@433.world how does that boot taste
-
@rhialto@mastodon.sdf.org 2025-07-01 11:57
@ehasbrouck@urbanists.social @Yuvalne@433.world that is not true. They had books for which you had to log in to view them at restricted url. Only one person at a time could do that. I know because there was a book I wanted to read and I had to go through this procedure.
-
@cibersheep@mastodont.cat 2025-07-01 14:06
@ehasbrouck@urbanists.social not true at all Lending book was indeed limited by a copy at a time, thus the long waiting list on famous books. I would say you never ever tried the feature. You might be talking about the access ti PD books. Making a biased and wrong assuption to defend copyright holders whom have too much power already. @Yuvalne@433.world
-
@a1ba@suya.place 2025-07-02 15:30
@ehasbrouck@urbanists.social @Yuvalne@433.world is that supposed to be a flaw?