Post #3026419

2026-03-10 15:15 UTC

@WeAreFairphone@social.fairphone.community If there has to be a system for controlling which devices and operating systems people are allowed to use for running banking and government apps, it shouldn't be run by for-profit companies with massive conflicts of interest. They're going to permit their own products regardless of how insecure those are which will lock out competition. It's not a positive thing because European companies are doing it. If it has to be exist it needs to be neutral and fair, not this.

Replies (4)

@alsi@chaos.social 2026-03-10 15:44

@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @WeAreFairphone@social.fairphone.community Just a quick question: Will GrapheneOS be installable on the Fairphone?

Open ##3026420
@fartwithfury@infosec.exchange 2026-03-10 17:35

@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @WeAreFairphone@social.fairphone.community @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu Have you two met? Or do you require an id to talk to eachother? The child safety stuff is frustrating beyond belief

Open ##3026422
@avron@piaille.fr 2026-03-11 10:38

@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @WeAreFairphone@social.fairphone.community Why should there be any restriction on the app and the OS people use when accessing any service whether bank or something else? This seems like a perfect excuse to lock down users, it is bad regardless who controls it. Security should not rely on restricting the user freedom.

Open ##3026424
@RonRevog@social.tchncs.de 2026-03-11 23:21

@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @WeAreFairphone@social.fairphone.community Why aren't you part of this initiative? You could contribute your expertise. Is confrontation and attack really the best way to deal with this? Your priority is security and data privacy. Acceptable. Others, however, place more value on fairness, better repairability, long live support, European standards or similar things. Work together. Why so sensitive?🫤

Open ##3026426