Post #2991962
2024-07-27 22:59 UTC
@gsuberland@chaos.social @DanadasGrau@mastodon.social @shac@ioc.exchange @skaverat@skaverat.net any logic would have to be in confusing a 0 for a NULL though, which would hopefully be resolved long before this particular issue came up. (For starters, if a birthday isn't required, users would get tired quickly of seeing tons of people born in 1970 who weren't. And math isn't done super often on birthdays except to display an age, so it'd be mostly benign)
Replies (2)
-
@gsuberland@chaos.social 2024-07-27 23:00
@wilbr@glitch.social @DanadasGrau@mastodon.social @shac@ioc.exchange @skaverat@skaverat.net *laughs in spent the last 11 years reviewing other people's code*
-
@tsukkitsune@is.nota.live 2024-07-28 01:14
@wilbr@glitch.social @gsuberland@chaos.social @DanadasGrau@mastodon.social @shac@ioc.exchange @skaverat@skaverat.net You'd think. But check out what IAEA PRIS does with power reactors that haven't come on-line yet and therefore don't have a date of first grid connection. If you sort the listings by that column — BAM! to 1970 they go. https://pris.iaea.org/pris/CountryStatistics/CountryDetails.aspx?current=GB