Post #29256

2025-12-04 07:15 UTC

Revolutions stand or fall with public support. Voting is the most visible way to establish public sentiment. People like to quote that only a third of the US actually elected Trump, but do we have a clear idea of just how many oppose him, if so many voters apparently never expressed their opinion in any measurable way? Doing nothing and complaining on the internet is useless. Doing something is scary. If you knew you had your community at your back, wouldn’t you feel more confident to step up? You’re right that people need to know that voting won’t be enough, but it’s still important in order to communicate the public opinion that separates a revolution from a coup.

Replies (3)

@DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 2025-12-04 07:30

what about voting AND revolution

Open ##29293
@Bluewing@lemmy.world 2025-12-04 13:06

Even along with public support, revolutions need their violent wing. MLK wouldn’t have been as nearly successful without the Black Panthers visibly totin’ guns on the 5 O’Clock news. It made MLK look very reasonable to deal with. Gandhi, the modern Icon of peaceful protest winning the day, had armed rebellions popping up behind him. The Indian’s had nearly a 100 year history of violence against the British. And an exhausted Great Britain just wanting to get out of the colonial business didn’t hurt either. When facing despots and fascists, there needs to be people willing to kill and die for the cause of freedom. We have not reached that point yet.

Open ##29880
@BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2025-12-04 13:50

That is indeed a good argument for voting, but voting third party

Open ##29991