Post #2919727
2026-05-14 02:26 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@lina@vt.social 2026-05-14 03:56
Apparently I was so annoyed I didn't realize I typoed Swift as Switch... ^^;;
-
@gfaster@tilde.zone 2026-05-14 02:47
@lina@vt.social I suppose it stands to reason, in a way, nothing has been done right? In just the same way I still write code despite knowing an alternative implementation doing exactly what I wanted already exists in the Library of Babel. There is clearly no design nor intent there - it amounts to merely noise. At least that's my view
-
@lykso@tiny.tilde.website 2026-05-14 03:09
@lina@vt.social It'd be nice for there to be a *good* version, right? Not gonna get that from vibe-coded crap.
-
@Auster@thebrainbin.org 2026-05-14 05:08
@lina@vt.social quality vs. quantity I think is a worthy reason to keep going: You took the effort to understand the framework. "Vibecoders", horrible name for people that are more of managers / commissioners, looking at how they seem to go usually, likely at most just look at the output and if don't see anything obviously wrong, just push it to production. So if this other other project is indeed machine-generated, which would seem so by the speed it came and the snippet you showed, it wouldn't sound far-fetched the in-depth understanding and by extension, the quality, are compromised. Also, going by some experiences of my own, I would also note there are way too many people, some even seemingly well-intented, that want to drag down any ideas and projects, as well as those that brought such up. Can't say that's the case for this other individual, but if it is, you giving up also means the person wins. And lastly, being the same solution on the snippet you showed, couldn't it be considered theft, specially if there's no attribution?