Post #2913180
2026-05-12 06:37 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@MuhammadFreeSoftware@fosstodon.org 2026-05-12 13:58
@jeffmcneill@hachyderm.io @Gusted@social.linux.pizza The OP is simply saying that Forgejo and Codeberg are not the right place to do stuff with AI, and points you to what they assume is the right place. This is obviously not rude, there's nothing wrong against this.
-
@famfo@frogs.lgbt 2026-05-12 20:01
@jeffmcneill@hachyderm.io @Gusted@social.linux.pizza yes, I participate in algorithm aversion, I do not want my data to be encrypted with triple DES for example
-
@domi@donotsta.re 2026-05-12 20:24
@jeffmcneill@hachyderm.io @Gusted@social.linux.pizza i’m full of algorithm aversion AND PROUD OF IT
-
@ar@is-a.cat 2026-05-12 20:44
@jeffmcneill@hachyderm.io @Gusted@social.linux.pizza no, not "algorithm aversion" algorithms are reasonably well defined and operate with expected outcomes. slop generators are neither well defined, nor produce outcomes reproducibly. thus the correct term would be "slop aversion".