Post #2913114
2026-02-11 10:38 UTC
@johnbutler@typo.social @db@typo.social I am reading the article on Source Serif, which is a subject I’m intimately familiar with. While the Groki-article is much more in-depth, there’s just a lot of fluff, and stuff that would rightfully receive a [citation needed] on Wikipedia.
I know some Wikipedia articles are sparse, but I’d rather read about the essence of a subject than marketing-like copy which just takes a lot of time and energy.
Replies (1)
-
@db@typo.social 2026-02-11 11:28
@johnbutler@typo.social @frankrolf@typo.social I think the response to the ”AI summary for Wikipedia pages” initiative was very apt: the page _is_ the summary.