Post #2900992
2026-04-18 16:32 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@trwnh@mastodon.social 2026-04-18 16:35
@cwebber@social.coop @bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.org @ossguy@fedi.copyleft.org @richardfontana@mastodon.social sure, but my point is this would happen less often
-
@bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.org 2026-04-18 23:27
@cwebber@social.coop wrote: > “ Plenty of Microsoft code has been released [publicly] under "shared source" licenses [and may well be in training sets]” An interesting point! We should call on Microsoft to agree: if you end up with copyright violations of their source-available FOSS licenses, that they will offer a unilateral covenant-not-to-sue. They already indemnify Copilot users, but it's good advocacy tactics to point out they didn't indemnify Claude users for same. Cc: @trwnh@mastodon.social @richardfontana@mastodon.social @ossguy@fedi.copyleft.org