Post #2900984

@bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.org > Re: “copyleft-only #LLM”: I didn't propose that. I proposed copylefting the human-modified output of LLMs. You didn't propose it, but @ossguy@fedi.copyleft.org brought it up here: https://fedi.copyleft.org/@ossguy/116411885602822736 You two have been speaking fairly collaboratively in this thread, so I'm assuming relatively synced at the moment. Since I presume the goal of "only train on copylefted [and implied, compatible] software" would not be, from your end, to erase copyleft, my assumption here is that the hope was that the output was also copylefted. And I presume reading this that you do hope that would be the presumption: https://fedi.copyleft.org/@bkuhn/116428083639528264 @richardfontana@mastodon.social @jedbrown@hachyderm.io