Post #2876696
2023-01-03 17:05 UTC
Particularly because these laws would, in effect, prevent people developing tech from NOT building mass surveillance and censorship capabilities. Which, while extremely poorly argued, is effectively the main thrust of the op-ed. 5/
Replies (1)
-
@Mer__edith@mastodon.world 2023-01-03 17:05
In short, we are right, our arguments are robust, and we have done the reading. But if we want to defend privacy, we’ll need to be coordinated and bold, and not make the mistake of assuming being correct is in itself a strategy. We have a lot of work ahead in 2023! FIN