Post #2823518
2026-05-23 14:19 UTC
Replies (6)
-
@gisgeek@floss.social 2026-05-23 14:41
@EvenRouault@mastodon.social We should all recognize the existence and dignity of the 'good enough' code: code that works enough as is, is maintained enough, and does not need big evolutions. They often call that a dead-end code, but I disagree. It is simply good enough for its purpose, and fuck the majority.
-
@pwramsey@mastodon.social 2026-05-23 15:15
@EvenRouault@mastodon.social This feels like Y2K, except there's no code owner with an incentive to fix the security issues. For projects with 100% maintainership, we can probably weather it, but you're right, the not-quite-dead projects that are still being used... they are about to become unclosed security holes.
-
@ajnn@snabelen.no 2026-05-24 03:45
@Shadowfetch@indieweb.social @EvenRouault@mastodon.social I’ve been meaning to do more or less the same thing for some of my stuff. I like your wording, might end up using it!
-
@strk@mapstodon.space 2026-05-24 06:30
@Shadowfetch@indieweb.social @ajnn@snabelen.no "this software Is distributed as is, no warranty", that's how the GPL words it, more or less
-
@sgillies@mastodon.social 2026-05-23 16:28
@EvenRouault@mastodon.social be careful... if you decapitate a JPEG library three more sprout in its place.
-
@strk@mapstodon.space 2026-05-24 06:33
@EvenRouault@mastodon.social I'd do nothing I don't need or I'm payed to do. Let's get back to the basis of this. When did we start feeling pressured to fix other people's problems ? If anyone asks for help, teach them to fish.