Post #2811017
2025-11-25 22:02 UTC
@issotm@social.treehouse.systems @watchfulcitizen@goingdark.social It was meant to be a link to https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private about the extraordinarily level of insecurity of /e/ devices. We've edited the post to use the correct URL.
> implying that this is *not* the use case y'all have intended for it.
We're focused on what law enforcement is claiming, not journalists. The articles are a source for what law enforcement is claiming via their quotes and paraphrasing. Our issue is with what law enforcement has claimed and threatened.
Replies (1)
-
@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social 2025-11-25 22:03
@issotm@social.treehouse.systems @watchfulcitizen@goingdark.social > But neither of the above two is state-funded, and since I don't have access to the contents I can't say they got the info from state agencies. How'd you know? There are numerous other articles including from franceinfo and other sites. There are 2 articles from Le Parisien, not one, and the 2nd article contains a clear threat. We've posted a response to how things are being misrepresented at https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/115611923320332112 with a link to the article we're talking about.