Post #2745798
2026-05-16 08:08 UTC
@yantar92@fosstodon.org @screwlisp@gamerplus.org This needs to be separated from Orgmode IMO. Otherwise it would never be effective outside of our community.
To make it very easy for tools was the idea of OD1.
https://gitlab.com/publicvoit/orgdown/-/blob/master/doc/Orgdown-Levels.org
Any specification could help if it's not an all-or-nothing approach. That's the greatest risk from my point of view.
Testing suites for parsers could replace the compatibility tables of https://gitlab.com/publicvoit/orgdown/-/blob/master/doc/tools/Template.org
👍
Replies (2)
-
@screwlisp@gamerplus.org 2026-05-16 08:09
@publicvoit@graz.social @yantar92@fosstodon.org Thank-you for the topic, let us talk about the topic a little during tomorrow's interview.
-
@screwlisp@gamerplus.org 2026-05-16 08:16
@publicvoit@graz.social @yantar92@fosstodon.org A thought on this topic though I do want to save-some-for-the-live-discussion. When I can find time I do strive to be involved in the ontolog forum. So I understand the desire to create standards, and standardising ways of writing standards, and reasons to resist standardisation.