Post #2652700
2026-04-02 19:21 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@frank@frankwiles.social 2026-04-02 19:45
@adriano@lile.cl @janl@narrativ.es @jacob@social.jacobian.org I recently got some blood work done and I’m very Vitamin D deficient so I’m personally quite glad I can’t photosynthesize as my vampire ass would be dead 🤣
-
@jacob@social.jacobian.org 2026-04-02 21:33
@adriano@lile.cl @frank@frankwiles.social @janl@narrativ.es It’s frustrating because the thing I was trying to discuss about the question of why code quality matters, not yet another “LLMs: good or evil” argument. And for the most part replies have been focused on that — and have really teased out some super interesting points about what “quality” means and why it’s important. And in doing so I think makes a much better case against agentic coding ever working the way proponents claim it might!
-
@dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net 2026-04-03 14:01
@janl@narrativ.es @jacob@social.jacobian.org @frank@frankwiles.social @adriano@lile.cl "Imagine a codebase…" buddy I DON'T HAVE TO, Claude Code leaked! It's dogshit! It's all dogshit! There's little point in entertaining thoughts about how good LLMs """could be""" at some nebulous future when the best LLM """tools™️""" TODAY are nightmares of over-engineered spaghetti that somehow cost hundreds of billions of dollars to function. We're 4 years into the LLM hype-train, 8 years into transformer models as a concept, and over a TRILLION dollars spent on development. If these things were gonna """get good""", IT SHOULD'VE HAPPENED BY NOW!!!