Post #2583473

2026-05-15 21:54 UTC

I genuinely think it has too high an "intelligence-to-get-it floor", for lack of a better term. Sometimes I'm not even sure if the LABS get it (Anthropic publishing a post about a "mind reader" for Claude). A lot of previously smart-enough people are falling for the convincingness of the output and are incapable of checking for *correctness* all that to say, it could be a long while until it's "treated as a normal technology"

Replies (1)

@meeper@netzsphaere.xyz 2026-05-15 22:05

@WandererUber@poa.st @lain@lain.com probably coming off as a bit of the anti llm for the sake of anti llm side but- idk how that happens tbh ik web ui models are kinda shit especially without harnesses (agentic stuff inmean) and really haven't ever vibe coded. but I've used it as a reseaech assistant (with all the deep research bells and whistles google afforded me) and while certainly helpful (still doesn't replace normal searching for me, probably as I prefer searching first) l. Its obviously not a smart thing and makes stupid as hell errors or honestly fails to get the point (which is kinda obvious since they are fundamentally word generators) One example is how It starts phrasing everything with basis on a fact which should have been treated irrelevant. I tried to use it to write a slop paper and report (uni obligation) it was so bad that I basically didnit manually. Ig it is me actually having standards but it felr quite bad and focised on entirelynthe wrongnthings and had such terrible flow that babying itnto get something worthwhile was harder than actually writing it myself code (surprisingly due to the NLP roots of the architecture) is probably a best case scenario in hindsight which is why they actually end up being surprisingly useful for thay

Open ##2583753