Post #2583132

2026-05-15 21:47 UTC

@WandererUber@poa.st yeah, that's true. if current level training turns out to be not profitable, we won't get better models soon. but the current ones still are profitable. so i'm not sure what we are disagreeing on

Replies (2)

@WandererUber@poa.st 2026-05-15 21:51

idk I just don't get why you are making the argument that GLM 5.1 inference is profitable for providers at all here. The issue is something else. If you are seriously implying that GLM 5.1 is good enough that people would use it over $100 2028 Claude, then I guess we disagree about that. It's as if I said "training models could be an issue to do anonymously if Nvidia puts phone # verification in their GPUs and you have to buy a second one" and you replied with "a 2023 chromebook will be cheap forever" It's besides the point.

Open ##2583210
@meeper@netzsphaere.xyz 2026-05-15 21:51

@lain@lain.com @WandererUber@poa.st Diminishing returns that way would honestly be for the best, a lot of hate is due to aggressive hype fear fomo mongering and having it turn into a normal industry would make folk relax. and treat it as a normal technology

Open ##2583477