Post #2566028
2026-05-06 13:32 UTC
@UKFilmNerd@mastodon.me.uk
Good review! Funny, most people I follow had the opposite (but predictable) complaint, "The book was better! The science was everything and they left out so many good bits! Wahhh". I laugh because while I thoroughly enjoyed the book (and "hard" science fiction, in general) I'm actually shocked that they were able to release a "mere" 2 hour 45 minute movie that included as much science as they did.
Also, the movie got the can-do tone, humor and hopefulness just right. One of the best movies in the last decade, IMO. Hey, and the Motion Picture Academy has said puppeted characters are now eligible for best-supporting Oscar. Give James "Rocky" Ortiz a statue!
Also, take heart, all you book-was-better nerds, the film editor said they had a 6-hour rough cut they chopped down to 3.5-hours for the initial audience screener. (Which tested well even at that length.) So, there's plenty of material for an extended cut with the extra science you missed.
Replies (1)
-
@UKFilmNerd@mastodon.me.uk 2026-05-06 16:51
@PixelJones@mindly.social Thank you very much for reading and comments. While I would like to see deleted scenes / longer cut, I would really like to see Lord & Millers take on Solo. There's still no definitive answer on how much of their work remains in the final film. To be honest, Disney would never release that footage anyway. Why would they. It's only of interest to a few uber nerds! 😁