Post #2553665
2025-11-11 17:58 UTC
@esoterra@hachyderm.io Yes, that's the secure vs. insecure distinction I belatedly started making in this thread.
Replies (1)
-
@esoterra@hachyderm.io 2025-11-11 18:02
@sunfish@hachyderm.io I know, I was just thinking through it for a specific example and arriving at the conclusion that if embedding PRNG+seed is fine for insecure random numbers, we probably don't need a built-in for them and reproducible/replay-able components probably should never touch the secure built-in.