Post #2538222
2026-05-14 20:55 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@vriska@lizards.live 2026-05-14 20:59
@Tony@clew.lol @mitchconner@clubcyberia.co you're better off doing that than letting more taxpayer money go to Israel and Europe tee bee haitch
-
@mitchconner@clubcyberia.co 2026-05-14 20:58
@Tony@clew.lol @vriska@lizards.live yep I've seen young black men eager to work and move out and their moms REEEEEE NOOO YOULL STOP THE BENNIES
-
@BowsacNoodle@poa.st 2026-05-14 21:03
Simple solution that would at least give an off ramp is to phase out benefits over something like a 3:1 ratio. e.g. you lose $1 of benefits for every $3 earned above the threshold. This doesn’t satisfy the anti welfare crowd, because it is an expansion of gibs, but it does allow a path off the system for those so inclined. I think it would be worth trying in a few states, as it may reduce total welfare dollars. Logic is you can’t go from part time to store manager without something in between that makes you a net loser in pay short term under current setup.