@mission_europa@universeodon.com
Post #2538181
2023-01-12 16:50 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@mission_europa@universeodon.com 2023-01-12 16:56
@hildabast@mastodon.online And I do feel that it wasn't it's primary use, but often if you are dealing with a "bigger" account in a debate in the replies, that big accounts are more likely to QT to get attention to their arguments that weren't getting in their individual replies. The person with a smaller account has no such recourse to "call for backup" given the audience size difference. Is that wrong? I'm not sure but it kinda sucks that some have "can escape a debate" privileges
-
@hildabast@mastodon.online 2023-01-12 19:31
@mission_europa@universeodon.com I mention in the post that if the algorithm gave QTs particular weight, that would influence how often we saw them - but the Twitter algorithm is secret, so we can't know. Mastodon doesn't use any algorithm at all for the Home feed - you see it chronologically.
-
@FeralRobots@mastodon.social 2023-01-12 22:39
@mission_europa@universeodon.com @hildabast@mastodon.online This was baked into the UI: Quote tweets are full tweets, & get a higher precedence than replies. It's possible full tweets get higher algorithmic ranking - I don't know - but they get pride of placement, which is going to inherently enhance their reach, if in some cases only a little.
-
@Bitnik@musician.social 2023-01-13 18:00
@mission_europa@universeodon.com @hildabast@mastodon.online there is no curation algorithm in the Fediverse. Your choice of instance will determine whose posts you see and who will see you. You see posts in reverse chronological order. This applies to all lists and timelines.