Elektrine lite

← Feed

@Djehngo@lemmy.world

Post #2537291

2026-05-01 14:24 UTC

So this is pure conjecture and makes far too many assumptions about ASD and NT people; but I have two theories: 1) I suspect NT have an easier time with these situations since they have an easier time reading the emotions of others, which means they have a more accurate understanding of the consequences. ASD people are less confident in understanding how others may react so they catastrophize (X will be upset with me because I didn't do exactly Y) NT people know that the person on the counter isn't mad that they don't have correct change, they know that their parents are happy about the effort and the will to help ileven if the outcome isn't the same. Theory 2 which is related: A reliance on rules, scripts patterns and rituals to navigate the world makes uncontrollable deviations from these highly unpleasant, and empathy suggests that things you find unpleasant are probably unpleasant for others too. This is compounded by the way people react negatively to atypical social reactions (this looks a lot like you have broken someone's social interaction script and they are unhappy) This then loops into itself and causes recursive problems; if you are forced off script you have atypical social interactions (I don't have enough money for this, can I go home and get more) Vs the normal interactions the chaser has. This means you can perceive yourself as propagating your troubles to everyone else. E.g. if you bring home the wrong fish will your parents still be able to cook dinner or will they have to *gasp* improvise on the recipe. By contrast NT people can see that the cashier experiencing unusual circumstances isn't a problem, they don't care and are just happy that the weird customer isn't demanding to speak to the manager because something was out of stock. All of this means that NT people have a reduced (and more accurate) perception of the stakes involved and therefore less stress and less need to over-plan.

Replies (3)

  • @randomdeadguy@lemmy.world 2026-05-01 14:47

    Thank you, O kind and wise internet stranger. What you've said speaks deeply to me about my own self-limiting behaviors when it comes to social interacting at large. I hate to inconvenience anyone so I avoid starting interactions at a cost to my happiness. I'm finding out that I perceive small inconveniences as much larger than they are, while most people perceive small problems more accurately, like you said.

    Open ##2537294

  • Mom's (inevitable) annoyance is the extreme priority here, which seems to be the only consideration. This misses how a vendor not having the desired product would be the source of annoyance. All the hallmarks of planning and improvising alternatives are all here. However, whether there's another fish vendor with trout, for example, is clouded by this fear of mom being annoyed. That's what gets the mental attention. So that stands out to me: a child's fear of parental backlash being paralyzing. Just roadblocks the whole process.

    Open ##2537295

  • @rat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-05-02 07:59

    Oh. I thought it was about having a strict parent. Her thought process seems entirely reasonable to me. My mother would've absolutely yell at me if I came home without/with the wrong fish. She's yelled at me over getting the wrong color eggs (despite never specifying beforehand).

    Open ##2537296