Post #2491547
2026-05-06 07:11 UTC
@RaymondPierreL3@aus.social
When markets fail it seems to me that a government has two options:
1) Provide their own competition. Either set up a department to build housing, or commission houses from the existing builders. The first is typically not very satisfactory as you end up with large numbers of identical buildings which become undesirable places to live. (see Canberra in the early days) and the second can lead to corruption. Neither of these would survive a right wing government in any useful way.
2) The other option is to encourage more competition. A possible way would be to use the taxation system to penalise those with too large a market share. Use the taxation system to make it financially attractive to split your company.
I suspect a market share tax would solve a lot of the problems of capitalism in a democracy.
Replies (1)
-
@RaymondPierreL3@aus.social 2026-05-06 10:09
@ocratato@discuss.systems That govt has a large role to play is self-evident. As for the practical means of delivering social housing there are ample examples of non-private and not for profit models overseas to look into. TBH. Social housing recipients wouldn’t care if they lived in identical houses. And any desire for asthetic differences would be tantamount to NIMBYism, something they could ill afford to espouse on ethical and moral grounds. I’ll have to end it here — time to retire from social media for another day.