Post #2489328

2026-04-23 17:22 UTC

@Wolkensteine@mastodon.wolkenheim.eu it would be very nice if @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de could make a stand here, but i am also aware it can be difficult to enforce such a policy. so i feel enforcement should only be done in obvious cases and after repeated warnings genai boosters tend to be very obvious about it and they would rather leave the platform than not be able to promote their abusive tech, so that does make enforcement a bit easier it's also better that they have to lie about their usage of it than that they can be proud of it this is something i would love to have a discussion on with other people, to try and create a sane policy that will not affect innocent projects

Replies (1)

@Wolkensteine@mastodon.wolkenheim.eu 2026-04-23 17:34

@lumi@snug.moe @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de I've read a bit through the issues of the project and found that for after v0.2.0 they plan to add not only a notes field but also a way to point out bad URLs. Also, I seem to have understood the workings a bit wrong, since you can not only vouch for a domain but also subpages on that domain. This is certainly nice for pages where multiple people might publish. This will at least make it more granular and with notes you could add why you vouch for it. Currently they suggest all sites to add an /ai page to describe their policies (personally I will refer people just to my blog post about AI since I am not against neural learning but mostly how it is done right now and that needs a bunch of text). But since this seems to be in its early stages this all might change later on. I would also love if @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de added a policy for that, but sadly many people want to just put that kind of rule off, just because it appears to be unenforceable.

Open ##2489329