Post #2489329

2026-04-23 17:34 UTC

@lumi@snug.moe @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de I've read a bit through the issues of the project and found that for after v0.2.0 they plan to add not only a notes field but also a way to point out bad URLs. Also, I seem to have understood the workings a bit wrong, since you can not only vouch for a domain but also subpages on that domain. This is certainly nice for pages where multiple people might publish. This will at least make it more granular and with notes you could add why you vouch for it. Currently they suggest all sites to add an /ai page to describe their policies (personally I will refer people just to my blog post about AI since I am not against neural learning but mostly how it is done right now and that needs a bunch of text). But since this seems to be in its early stages this all might change later on. I would also love if @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de added a policy for that, but sadly many people want to just put that kind of rule off, just because it appears to be unenforceable.

Replies (2)

@Wolkensteine@mastodon.wolkenheim.eu 2026-04-23 17:35

@lumi@snug.moe @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de If Codeberg took such a policy to a member's vote (members of the e.V.) then I'd certainly vote for that policy.

Open ##2489330
@lumi@snug.moe 2026-04-23 17:36

@Wolkensteine@mastodon.wolkenheim.eu @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de oh that is very neat indeed it's actually way more enforceable than people expect, because genai boosters tend to be so obvious about it. and i think banning obvious use or promotion of genai is already a great first step. at least don't let them proudly use it also have a document stating codeberg itself is completely against genai at that point, why would genai boosters use codeberg? they can just use github, and they can be proud and out about their dehumanization machines there

Open ##2489332