@jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
Post #2485436
2023-07-23 21:18 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@richardrathe@universeodon.com 2023-07-24 06:17
@jupiter_rowland I've been mostly offline for ten days, but have the internet again so… The W3C actually has a bunch of how-to and best practice info on their site… https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/images/decision-tree/ We are both correct in a sense…. Empty alt="" are much more acceptable/preferred than I thought. Basically… text/info in image… summarize in the #AltText. Content of photo is basically described in the body of the post… empty. Image is purely decorative… empty. Image is part of a link or navigation element (or an icon) alt="function of link", etc. So back to my original complaint… sometimes the basic info (like what kind of bird it is) is NOT in the post, but there is extensive info in the alt text. I'm arguing that some of that info be made visible as part of the post. Example… POST: "Hey look at these great birds!" IMAGE ALT TEXT: Full paragraph describing each bird, genus species, location, what they're feeding on, etc. I'm going to stop documenting everything twice!