@richardrathe@universeodon.com
Post #2485437
2023-07-24 06:17 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.eu 2023-07-24 06:46
@@richardrathe@universeodon.com In this case, the post is about the picture. The post was made to show the picture. And in this case, yes, it can make sense to put a detailed description into the body of the post itself Now imagine that the post is actually 400 characters about how kingfishers are a protected species in Germany, or how pigeons can be not only a nuisance, but actually a health threat in big cities. In this case, the post is not about the picture. If there's a picture, it's redundant, unnecessary and purely added as something between decoration and nice-to-have illustration. Adding a full description of the picture in the body of the post does not look too good, not if the post is not about the picture. Okay, now you may argue that a 400-character post won't leave much room for an image description. Not if you write it on most Mastodon instances. But absolutely everywhere else in the Fediverse, you can have a 400-character post + a picture + several thousand characters of image description. I myself could probably write posts in excess of 50,000 characters altogether.