Post #2433615

@plektix@mathstodon.xyz Peer review is useful indeed and preprints are perfectly compatible with it. The Gates Foundation repository does preprint peer review, BioRxiv has a peer review overlay* (used by eLife) and there are multiple organisations collating preprint reviews (e.g. PreReview, ReviewCommons). I’d love to see separate, non-profit entities for curation (as PreLights does), in depth critical review (PubPeer, but friendlier) and publishing (Rxiv servers). * https://www.science.org/content/article/bid-boost-transparency-biorxiv-begins-posting-peer-reviews-next-preprints