Post #2419247

@ole@chaos.social If “no person” provided inaccurate criminal history and accurate address in this case (even though humans had to set the computer up, tell it what data to ingest, and run the program which turned that data into incorrect and defamatory output), then a toot which provided inaccurate criminal history and accurate address (or other libellous/dangerous content) should avoid being considered libel because it, too, was provided by a computer under instruction from a human somewhere.