Post #2389450

2026-03-27 23:25 UTC

@n_dimension@infosec.exchange @wifsten@mas.to Right, it'll be interesting to see if they do a follow-up. We should really have much much much more serious research on the effects of brains of _all_ sorts of things connected to daily life in our tech socities. One of the most inspiring things in science I know of is the studies of how synchronous brain waves arise between toddler and care-taker when they engage in proto-dialogue; and similar can happen between adults as well. This has what M. Buber called "I-Thou" in it

Replies (1)

@n_dimension@infosec.exchange 2026-03-27 23:35

@i_dont_like_ai@mastodon.social @wifsten@mas.to I wholeheartedly agree. There are two... three if you include the joke of a BBC "study" that are the front of the spear for the anti-#AI, neo-luddite movement... and all three of them are shite. There is plenty about AI that needs spotlight brought upon it... but I see very, very few solid arguments argued well to put any reasonable controls upon it. This is one of the reasons I still engage with the anti-Ai movement, even though it usually ends with name calling and a block. The folks who are passionate about controlling AI are largely poorly informed and use emotion instead of facts. Which is a shame, because without credibility, they can accomplish nothing but dance around the fire with the other woodfolk 💀

Open ##2389451