Post #2389445
2026-03-25 11:06 UTC
@wifsten@mas.to @i_dont_like_ai@mastodon.social
The Kosmyna "Your Brain on ChatGPT" preprint at least hooked up EEGs and measured actual brains doing actual tasks. Flawed, preliminary, n=54 — but real science trying.
Gerlich? STOP. CITING. GERLICH.
(It's Business school FFS)
The viral "AI makes you dumb" paper doesn't test if AI makes you dumb. It asks people to self-rate their thinking on a Likert scale. That's the whole study. A vibes check dressed up in ANOVA.
It claims to use the Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment. It doesn't. Zero HCTA items. That's not a simplification, that's fraud-adjacent.
Let me restate IT DOES NOT MEASURE CRITICAL THINKING!!!
Forbes ran it. Big Think ran it. PsyPost ran it. Psychology Today ran it. None of them read it.
A paper about the death of critical thinking, amplified by the total absence of critical thinking. This is what we deserve.
Nebu takes a hatchet to it an leaves a twitching corpse.
https://nebu.substack.com/p/highly-cited-ai-erodes-critical-thinking
#AI #AISlop #CriticalThinking #PeerReview #psychology #education
Replies (1)
-
@i_dont_like_ai@mastodon.social 2026-03-26 23:06
@n_dimension@infosec.exchange @wifsten@mas.to Fine work. It's good to research the inadequacy also of results one is agreement with! That's the true scientific spirit. It is in looking for actual facts with a non-self-asure attitude that we can get to genuine insights. Fake papers are not worth quoting even though their results are something one is in agreement of. By the way, there has been an MIT study (ie, a _real_ study) some months ago that pointed in same direction--that overhelpful computers make brains dumb.